Meeting the Nano-United Nations
June 28, 2010 - Ineke Malsch
Ineke Malsch is director of Malsch TechnoValuation and a consultant in technology and society.
Earlier this month, Beijing hosted the second annual ICPC NanoNet workshop dedicated to international cooperation between European nanoscientists and their colleagues in emerging economies and developing countries. The event was hosted by the Chinese Society of Micro-Nano Technology at Tsinghua University. Participants from Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe presented the state of the art of nanotechnology in their country and showed their eagerness to cooperate in new projects funded by the European Union and other funding bodies. The next calls for proposals under the EU Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) will be published at the end of July, and Dr Kamal Hossain of the UK's National Physical Laboratory urged participants to join consortia and submit proposals.
'Iconic nanoscience' (in the words of Prof. Ishenkumba Kahwa of the University of the West Indies, Jamaica), in which strong, enthusiastic individual scientists have managed to build up a research programme, is still predominant in many countries, especially in the Caribbean and Africa. These scientists were keen on exploring ways to convince their governments to get involved and incorporate nanotechnology into their national development plans. In other states in Asia, Latin America and Europe, governments have already included nanotechnology and other new technologies in their national strategies for science, technology and innovation.
The lack of telecommunication infrastructure in Africa severely restricts the participation of African nanoscientists in live teleconferences via the Internet. Prof. Malik Maaza of NanoAfNet, the African nanotechnology network, therefore proposed sending DVDs with webinars and conference videos to academic groups for state-of-the-art e-learning.
Of the three planned small discussion groups, the one on potential international cooperation and collaborations was most popular and gave rise to new initiatives. The other two small discussion groups on the EC code of conduct for responsible nanoresearch and on standardization were combined. This meant the discussion focused on differences and similarities between standardization and voluntary regulations as instruments for responsible nanotechnology development.
To facilitate international cooperation, project leader Lesley Tobin of the ICPC NanoNet project offered free tools, including online webinars on demand and an online discussion forum where nanoscientists can present and discuss their research with peers in other parts of the world.
trackback url:
About this blog
Nano Rights and PeacePart of the current Dutch societal dialogue on nanotechnology is the international dimension: implications of nanotechnolog...
13 posts, 3 comments
read more >>
Nano Rights and Peace
- Blog post: Regulatory challenges of nanomedice (September 08, 2010)
- Blog post: Euro-Asian exploration on nanoethics toolkit (August 26, 2010)
- Comment: UNITAR/OECD/IOMC awareness raising on nanotechnology (August 26, 2010)
- Comment: New ISO methodology demystifies nanomaterials (August 20, 2010)
- Blog post: Autonomous killer robots and ethics (August 16, 2010)
- Blog post: Avoiding the knowledge apartheid (August 11, 2010)
- Comment: Implementation of nanocode in Netherlands evaluated (July 16, 2010)
- Blog post: Nanotechnology for a knowledge society in emerging economies and developing countries (July 12, 2010)
- Blog post: Earth rights, public goods and nanotechnology: the new challenge for the social scientist (July 06, 2010)
- Blog post: About 'Nano Rights and Peace' (July 02, 2010)
- Blog post: EC code of conduct for responsible nanotechnology (June 29, 2010)
- Blog post: Millennium Development Goal 7 and nanotechnology (June 25, 2010)
- Blog post: Global norms and values for nanotechnology (June 11, 2010)
- Blog post: Nanotechnology and development (June 07, 2010)
- Blog post: Can nanotechnology really help end poverty? (June 01, 2010)

